regain compliance, the closing bid price of our Common Stock must be at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days during the Second Compliance Period, subject to Nasdaq’s discretion. We provided written notice to Nasdaq of our intention to cure the deficiency during the Second Compliance Period, by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary.
There can be no assurance that we will regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement by the end of the second 180-day compliance period on December 26, 2023 or otherwise maintain compliance with the other listing requirements.
If we do not meet the minimum bid price requirement by the end of the Second Compliance Period, our Common Stock will be subject to delisting by Nasdaq. If an issuer’s equity security is delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market, it may be forced to seek to have its equity security traded or quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or in the “pink sheets.” Such alternatives are generally considered to be less efficient markets and not as broad as The Nasdaq Capital Market, and therefore less desirable. Accordingly, the delisting, or even the potential delisting, of our Common Stock could have a negative impact on the liquidity and market price of our Common Stock.
As such, our Board believes that it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders that the Board has the ability to effect, in its discretion, the Reverse Stock Split to improve the price level of our Common Stock so that we are able to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement and minimize the risk of delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market.
Any delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market would likely result in further reductions in the market prices of our Common Stock, substantially limit the liquidity of our Common Stock, not only in the number of shares that could be bought and sold at a given price, which might be depressed by the relative illiquidity, but also through delays in the timing of transactions and reduction in media and analyst coverage, and materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital or pursue strategic restructuring, refinancing or other transactions on acceptable terms, or at all. Delisting from The Nasdaq Capital Market could also have other negative results, including the potential loss of institutional investor interest, fewer business development opportunities, and the inability to raise additional required capital. In addition, the SEC has adopted rules governing “penny stocks” that impose additional burdens on broker-dealers trading in stock priced at below $5.00 per share, unless listed on certain securities exchanges. In the event of a delisting, we anticipate taking actions to try to meet The Nasdaq Capital Market’s initial listing standards and submitting an application for our Common Stock to be listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our Common Stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our Common Stock, prevent our Common Stock from dropping below the minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with The Nasdaq Capital Market’s listing requirements, whether as to minimum bid price or otherwise.
In addition to regaining compliance with The Nasdaq Capital Market’s minimum bid price listing requirements, we also believe that the Reverse Stock Split and an increase in our stock price may make our Common Stock more attractive to a broader range of institutional and other investors (including funds that are prohibited from buying stocks whose price is below a certain threshold) and facilitate higher levels of institutional stock ownership, where investment policies generally prohibit investments in lower-priced securities, as well as better enable us to raise funds to help finance operations. We understand that many brokerage firms and institutional investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers, which reduces the number of potential purchasers of our Common Stock. In addition, some of those policies and practices may function to make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks economically less attractive to brokers. Investors may also be dissuaded from purchasing lower-priced stocks because the brokerage commissions, as a percentage of the total transaction, tend to be higher for such stocks. Moreover, we believe the analysts at many brokerage firms do not monitor the trading activity or otherwise provide coverage of lower-priced stocks. Further, lower-priced stocks have a perception in the investment community as being more risky and speculative, which may negatively impact not only the price of our Common Stock, but also our market liquidity.
Background — Authorized Capital Change
As a matter of Delaware law, implementation of the Reverse Stock Split does not require a change in the total number of shares of our Common Stock authorized under the Certificate of Incorporation. However, the Amendment will also effect the Authorized Capital Change, which is designed to maintain approximately the same proportion of the total number of authorized shares of Common Stock that are not issued or outstanding following the Reverse Stock Split, subject to adjustments for any fractional shares. This proposed reduction is intended to conform to the requirements of certain entities that make recommendations to stockholders regarding proposals submitted by us, and ensure that we do not have what some stockholders might view as an unreasonably high number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. In addition, the reduction in the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock may also reduce certain of our costs.